Supervisors' comments on my literature review for the last submission were that it was still a bit sparse. They suggested that I used references to methodological literature to help pad it out a bit; so I'll use such as Miles & Huberman and Gummersson and Yin.
However, I have been reading more on agency theory, pyschological contracts and clients, so may refer also to Eisenhardt, Conway & Briner as well as Rousseau and Miller.
Yeah. I know - that's just a list of stuff, but they are relevant in that they have theories that apply to what I'm doing.
Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1. Jan., 1989), pp. 57-74.
Gummesson E, 2000, Qualitative methods in management research, 2nd ed, Sage
Harmon, M. M. (1995). Responsibility as Paradox: a critique of rational discourse on government, Sage
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, Sage.
Miller, E. (1993). From dependency to autonomy: studies in organization and change, Free Association Books.
Rousseau, D. M, 2005, Developing psychological contract theory, in Great Minds in Management: The process of theory development, Eds. Smith & Hitt, Oxford.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, Sage.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment